В
Все
Б
Биология
Б
Беларуская мова
У
Українська мова
А
Алгебра
Р
Русский язык
О
ОБЖ
И
История
Ф
Физика
Қ
Қазақ тiлi
О
Окружающий мир
Э
Экономика
Н
Немецкий язык
Х
Химия
П
Право
П
Психология
Д
Другие предметы
Л
Литература
Г
География
Ф
Французский язык
М
Математика
М
Музыка
А
Английский язык
М
МХК
У
Українська література
И
Информатика
О
Обществознание
Г
Геометрия
Rita1007
Rita1007
05.03.2022 06:33 •  Английский язык

Read the text and answer the questions “Scientists have found the oldest DNA evidence yet of humans’ biological history. But instead of neatly clarifying human evolution, the finding is adding new mysteries. In a paper in the journal Nature, scientists reported Wednesday that they had saved ancient human DNA from a fossil dating back about 400,000 years, shattering the previous record of 100,000 years.
The mismatch between the anatomical and genetic evidence surprised the scientists, who are now rethinking human evolution over the past few hundred thousand years. It is possible, for example, that there are many extinct human populations that scientists have yet to discover. Right now, we’ve basically generated a big question mark,” said Matthias Meyer, a geneticist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, and a co-author of the new study.
Finding such ancient human DNA was a major advance, said David Reich, a geneticist at Harvard Medical School who was not involved in the research. “That’s an amazing, game-changing thing,” he said.
When Dr. Meyer and his colleagues found ancient human DNA inside they thought that it would be a very early Neanderthal,” Dr. Meyer said.
But the DNA did not match that of Neanderthals. Dr. Meyer then compared it to the DNA of the Denisovans, the ancient human lineage that he and his colleagues had discovered in Siberia in 2010. He was shocked to find that it was similar. Everybody had a hard time believing it at first, Dr. Meyer said. So we generated more and more data to nail it down. The extra research confirmed that the DNA belonged on the Denisovan branch of the human family tree. The new finding is hard to settle with the picture of human evolution that has been emerging based on fossils and ancient DNA…
Hints at new hidden difficulties in the human story came from a 400,000-year-old bone found in a cave in Spain called “the pit of bones”. The scientific team used new methods to extract the ancient DNA from the fossil and ancient DNA…

дшг

Показать ответ
Ответ:
etereshinakolo
etereshinakolo
28.09.2022 12:30
On Tuesday I got up at half past six. I went to the bathroon and washed my hands and face and cleaned my teeth. Then l dressed, went to the kitchen and cooked breakfast for my family. At half past seven my son got up and had breakfast. I had breakfast with my son. My son ate a sandwich and drank a cun of tea. I didn't drink tea. I drank coffee. After breakfast my son left home for school. I didn't leave home with my son. On Tuesday l didn' t work in the mornimg. I worked in the afternoon. In the evening l was at home. My husband and my son  were at home, too. We rested in  the evening. My son watched TV, my husband read newspapers and l did some work about the house. At about eleven o'clock we went to bed.
0,0(0 оценок)
Ответ:
hcufiyicii
hcufiyicii
05.12.2020 17:29
The impact of nanotechnology extends from its medical, ethical, mental, legal and environmental applications, to fields such as engineering, biology, chemistry, computing, materials science, and communications.Major benefits of nanotechnology include improved manufacturing methods, water purification systems, energy systems, physical enhancement, nanomedicine, better food production methods and nutrition and large scale infrastructure auto-fabrication.[vague] Nanotechnology's reduced size may allow for automation of tasks which were previously inaccessible due to physical restrictions, which in turn may reduce labor, land, or maintenance requirements placed on humans.Potential risks include environmental, health, and safety issues; transitional effects such as displacement of traditional industries as the products of nanotechnology become dominant, which are of concern to privacy rights advocates. These may be particularly important if potential negative effects of nanoparticles are overlooked.Whether nanotechnology merits special government regulation is a controversial issue. Regulatory bodies such as the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Health & Consumer Protection Directorate of the European Commission have started dealing with the potential risks of nanoparticles. The organic food sector has been the first to act with the regulated exclusion of engineered nanoparticles from certified organic produce, firstly in Australia and the UK,[1] and more recently in Canada, as well as for all food certified to Demeter International standards
0,0(0 оценок)
Популярные вопросы: Английский язык
Полный доступ
Позволит учиться лучше и быстрее. Неограниченный доступ к базе и ответам от экспертов и ai-bota Оформи подписку
logo
Начни делиться знаниями
Вход Регистрация
Что ты хочешь узнать?
Спроси ai-бота