Read the paragraphs (A-G), find the key words that can help y Add the information you know. A. This is an instrument that converts voice and sound signals into elect cal impulses for transmission by wire to a different location, where another e receives the electrical impulses and turns them back into sounds. Alexander Graham Bell invented it in 1875. B. There are many major milestones in its history, starting in 1936, when Konrad Zuse built the first freely programmable machine. c. In 1884, Paul Nipkow sent images over wires using a rotating metal disk mechanical and electronic. American Charles Jenkins and Scotsman John Baird technology with 18 lines of resolution. This invention then evolved along two followed the mechanical model while Philo Farnsworth, working independently in San Francisco, and the Russian emigrant Vladimir Zworykin, working for Westing house and later RCA, advanced the electronic model. D. In 1769, the very first road vehicle was invented by the French mechanic, Nicolas Joseph Cugnot. However, it was a steam-powered model. In 1885, Karl Benz designed and built the world's first practical model to be powered by an internal. combustion engine. DE. In 1814, Joseph Nicéphore Niépce created the first photographic image with a camera obscura, however, the image required eight hours of light exposure and later faded. Louis-Jacques-Mand Daguerre is considered the inventor of the first practical process of photography in 1837. 8. OF. The first functional machine of this kind was invented by the French tailor, Barthelemy Thimonnier, in 1830. In 1834, Walter Hunt built America's first success- ful machine of this kind. A little later Isaac Singer invented the up-and-down motion mechanism. G. This medicine was discovered by Alexander Fleming in 1928. Andrew Moyer patented the first method of industrial production of it in 1948. Read and say if th
My favorite book is Harry Potter's story. Movies, of course, are also good. But I, in general, love to read books more. And all because my fantasy works better than all these movies. And maybe not so well ... It's just that if I came up with something, created an image on the book, then it's difficult for me to accept another, even if it's better in the cinema. To me, I'm more immediate.
Harry Potter is far more sympathetic to me. And in the book, of course, more details. Here if you take the first book, then there is so much detail on life of Ron, which are lowered in the film - there is no time, of course. One clean up in the garden when they asked the gnomes and other fairy creatures to release the garden, and eventually threw them straight through the fence. When they all cleaned up, those garden gnomes began to crawl back into the garden, hooligans.
Excellent book! There's so much magic, so much humor. And the student's routine, albeit charming, reminds me of our study.
Here's the "Lord of the Rings" is also magic, but such a complex, loaded ... "Chronicles of Narnia", on the contrary, some very children: portal in the closet, talking animals.
Harry Potter falls into a whole new world, examining it, and the reader - along with him. The hero doubts himself! He sees that everyone sees him as a great magician, but he is still a student in magic. He is not a superhero, but a normal child. And such cool friends are his. I really like the funny Ron. Hermione is also very interesting, she has its drawbacks, but she is good. Incidentally, there everyone has his own disadvantage, all non-ideal. And even the worst exceptions in character - Snape is capable of good deeds, although it seems the main thief.
How I like dragons there, all the magic things! In the film, again, all made, as if in a nightmare, and in the book is not so scary.
I still like the spirit of adventure, the competition between different "factions". And it's nice that still I always win those who are nice to me. In the end, although this is sometimes not entirely obvious and understandable. A wonderful book!My favorite book is Harry Potter's story. Movies, of course, are also good. But I, in general, love to read books more. And all because my fantasy works better than all these movies. And maybe not so well ... It's just that if I came up with something, created an image on the book, then it's difficult for me to accept another, even if it's better in the cinema. To me, I'm more immediate.
Harry Potter is far more sympathetic to me. And in the book, of course, more details. Here if you take the first book, then there is so much detail on life of Ron, which are lowered in the film - there is no time, of course. One clean up in the garden when they asked the gnomes and other fairy creatures to release the garden, and eventually threw them straight through the fence. When they all cleaned up, those garden gnomes began to crawl back into the garden, hooligans.
Excellent book! There's so much magic, so much humor. And the student's routine, albeit charming, reminds me of our study.
Here's the "Lord of the Rings" is also magic, but such a complex, loaded ... "Chronicles of Narnia", on the contrary, some very children: portal in the closet, talking animals.
Harry Potter falls into a whole new world, examining it, and the reader - along with him. The hero doubts himself! He sees that everyone sees him as a great magician, but he is still a student in magic. He is not a superhero, but a normal child. And such cool friends are his. I really like the funny Ron. Hermione is also very interesting, she has its drawbacks, but she is good. Incidentally, there everyone has his own disadvantage, all non-ideal. And even the worst exceptions in character - Snape is capable of good deeds, although it seems the main thief.
How I like dragons there, all the magic things! In the film, again, all made, as if in a nightmare, and in the book is not so scary.
I still like the spirit of adventure, the competition between different "factions". And it's nice that still I always win those who are nice to me. In the end, although this is sometimes not entirely obvious and understandable. A wonderful book!
1. Why do you look so tired?
2. Aysel looks like her mother.
3. I’ve lost my watch and now I’m looking for it.
4. The primroses look like stars.
5. Shaig looked like an elegant film director.
6. Sebuhi looks like a rugby player. He’s enormous.
7. Aygun is looking through the newspaper now. She‘s going to find useful information.
1. Почему вы выглядите так устало?
2. Айсель похож на свою мать.
3. Я потерял свои часы, и теперь я ищу их.
4. Примулы выглядят как звезды.
5. Шейг выглядел элегантным режиссером.
6. Себухи выглядит как регбист. Он огромен.
7. Айгун просматривает газету. Она собирается найти полезную информацию.