Our desire to own unusual animals as pets often leads us to bring wild animals home. However, instances of a pet chimp attacking its owner or a big cat mauling its keeper are not rare. These incidents have often raised questions about the practice of having wild animals as pets. Let us weigh the pros and cons of this trend, which seems to be on the rise.
Debopriya Bose Last Updated: May 15, 2018
Every organism has evolved according to the environmental conditions that it was subjected to. This process of evolution took thousands of years, in which animals lost those features that were redundant for them and developed new ones that would help them adapt to the existing environmental conditions. Subsequently, wild animals developed the instincts and physical features that are suited for the tough and aggressive life in the wild.
Keeping wild animals might sound appealing to many. However, we must not forget the fact that handling one requires a good understanding of the animal's nature and habitat. Many people who own wild animals as pets are trained in handling them. Even they would agree about the unpredictable nature of wild animals. There have been incidents of mahouts being trampled by their elephants or trained zoo keepers being attacked by the animals in zoos. Hence, keeping wild animals as pets has always been a controversial issue. Listed below are the pros and cons.
the spruce and majestic Archangel Cathedral inside is quiet and gloomy. It's like he's filled with deep sadness. And it is clear why - under these arches lie the great Moscow princes and Russian tsars, from Ivan Kalita to Fyodor Mikhailovich Romanov. The temple is consecrated in the name of Archangel Michael, the leader of the angelic army and the head of the future Last judgment. He is in charge of escorting the souls of the righteous to the gates of Paradise.
It is believed that the stone Archangel Cathedral was built in 1333, dismantling the old wooden Church. Ostensibly Ivan Kalita did it in memory of the disaster that passed Russia, whether the plague, famine or crop failure. In the newly consecrated temple and put him, and then two sons. So the tradition of burial here of Grand Dukes, autocrats and members of their families was established. Already in his declining years, in 1505, Tsar Ivan III, who decided to complete the grandiose restructuring of the Moscow Kremlin with the construction of a worthy tomb. He entrusted this work to the Italian Aleviz, nicknamed New. But the result
AnimalSake
Pros and Cons of Keeping Wild Animals as Pets
Pros and Cons of Keeping Wild Animals as Pets
Our desire to own unusual animals as pets often leads us to bring wild animals home. However, instances of a pet chimp attacking its owner or a big cat mauling its keeper are not rare. These incidents have often raised questions about the practice of having wild animals as pets. Let us weigh the pros and cons of this trend, which seems to be on the rise.
Debopriya Bose Last Updated: May 15, 2018
Every organism has evolved according to the environmental conditions that it was subjected to. This process of evolution took thousands of years, in which animals lost those features that were redundant for them and developed new ones that would help them adapt to the existing environmental conditions. Subsequently, wild animals developed the instincts and physical features that are suited for the tough and aggressive life in the wild.
Keeping wild animals might sound appealing to many. However, we must not forget the fact that handling one requires a good understanding of the animal's nature and habitat. Many people who own wild animals as pets are trained in handling them. Even they would agree about the unpredictable nature of wild animals. There have been incidents of mahouts being trampled by their elephants or trained zoo keepers being attacked by the animals in zoos. Hence, keeping wild animals as pets has always been a controversial issue. Listed below are the pros and cons.
the spruce and majestic Archangel Cathedral inside is quiet and gloomy. It's like he's filled with deep sadness. And it is clear why - under these arches lie the great Moscow princes and Russian tsars, from Ivan Kalita to Fyodor Mikhailovich Romanov. The temple is consecrated in the name of Archangel Michael, the leader of the angelic army and the head of the future Last judgment. He is in charge of escorting the souls of the righteous to the gates of Paradise.
It is believed that the stone Archangel Cathedral was built in 1333, dismantling the old wooden Church. Ostensibly Ivan Kalita did it in memory of the disaster that passed Russia, whether the plague, famine or crop failure. In the newly consecrated temple and put him, and then two sons. So the tradition of burial here of Grand Dukes, autocrats and members of their families was established. Already in his declining years, in 1505, Tsar Ivan III, who decided to complete the grandiose restructuring of the Moscow Kremlin with the construction of a worthy tomb. He entrusted this work to the Italian Aleviz, nicknamed New. But the result