В
Все
Б
Биология
Б
Беларуская мова
У
Українська мова
А
Алгебра
Р
Русский язык
О
ОБЖ
И
История
Ф
Физика
Қ
Қазақ тiлi
О
Окружающий мир
Э
Экономика
Н
Немецкий язык
Х
Химия
П
Право
П
Психология
Д
Другие предметы
Л
Литература
Г
География
Ф
Французский язык
М
Математика
М
Музыка
А
Английский язык
М
МХК
У
Українська література
И
Информатика
О
Обществознание
Г
Геометрия

help me pl 1)Выписать пять предложений с модальными глаголами. Подчеркните модальные глаголы. Переведите предложения на русский язык.
While I’m on the topic of who should or shouldn’t negotiate, I’d like to warn you about non-police negotiators.
The SOARU (Special Operation and Research Unit) points out that using “civilian” negotiators like members of the subject’s family, friends, clergy, a mental health professional, or an attorney is a high-risk proposition.
Since these people have generally not been trained in negotiation, they will probably, under the stress of the situation, revert to their usual way of talking with the subject. All negotiators have heard stories about family members who come to the scene and say, “Let me talk to him, he’ll listen to me”. When they get on the phone, some will call the subject a jerk; another will say, “Hang in there, Joey, we’re all proud of you”.
Clergymen, on the other hand, may get excessively moralistic or theological, while attorneys may have difficulty deciding which side they represent. Even mental health professionals with experience in crisis intervention may have little to offer if they have not had negotiation training. They are accustomed to people coming to them and asking for help, not resisting it. And, generally, they don’t have the mental “set” to expect demands and to deal with lying or threats if those demands aren’t ment. After getting negotiation training, however, they can work well as consultants to the negotiation team.
Finally, if a non-police negotiator is being used and you decide to go tactical, that person may be reluctant (or may refuse) to participate in a tactical response and may alert the subject by changing or disrupting the negotiations. So, unless there are specific reasons to the contrary, negotiators should be drawn from our trained officers, with professional consultants to back them up if necessary.
2)подчеркните модальные глаголы или их эквиваленты. Переведите предложения на русский язык.
1. Safety and control must be the prime consideration in the decision-making process.
Контроль и безопасность должны быть главные в процессе принятия решения
2. We are to differentiate terrorists from the wide range of criminal personalities.
Мы должны различать террористов от широкого круга преступных личностей.
3. We have to find ways of breaking the vicious circle of repetition of offending.
Мы должны найти разорвать порочный круг повторения преступлений.
3) Выписать предложение сказуемые которых употреблены в страдательном залоге и инфинитив. Подчеркните сказуемые и инфинитивы.

Показать ответ
Ответ:
natalichexova
natalichexova
16.04.2021 21:51

1) While I’m on the topic of who should or shouldn’t negotiate, I’d like to warn you about non-police negotiators.— should, shouldn’t

Clergymen, on the other hand, may get excessively moralistic or theological, while attorneys may have difficulty deciding which side they represent.— may

Even mental health professionals with experience in crisis intervention may have little to offer if they have not had negotiation training.— may

After getting negotiation training, however, they can work well as consultants to the negotiation team.— can

So, unless there are specific reasons to the contrary, negotiators should be drawn from our trained officers, with professional consultants to back them up if necessary.— should

2)

1. must be

2. are to

3. have to 

0,0(0 оценок)
Популярные вопросы: Английский язык
Полный доступ
Позволит учиться лучше и быстрее. Неограниченный доступ к базе и ответам от экспертов и ai-bota Оформи подписку
logo
Начни делиться знаниями
Вход Регистрация
Что ты хочешь узнать?
Спроси ai-бота